Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:24
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Climate change leads to spread of infection-causing fungi, scientists say - ABC News
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
An old Capitol Hill troublemaker is trying to clinch a megabill deal - Politico
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Administration to phase out NIH support of HIV clinical guidelines - The Washington Post
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Random: Mario Kart World Player 'Breaks' The Game, Takes Flight Over Mario Circuit - Nintendo Life
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Infectious Updates 6/21/2025 - Daily Kos
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
What is a good source for finding job candidates?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.